The Quality of Rare Disease Registries: Evaluation and Characterization

Coi A, Santoro M, Villaverde-Hueso A, Lipucci Di Paola M, Gainotti S, Taruscio D, Posada de la Paz M, Bianchi F


Public Health Genomics 19(2):108-15, March 2016
DOI: 10.1159/000444476

Abstract

BACKGROUND:
The focus on the quality of the procedures for data collection, storing, and analysis in the definition and implementation of a rare disease registry (RDR) is the basis for developing a valid and long-term sustainable tool. The aim of this study was to provide useful information for characterizing a quality profile for RDRs using an analytical approach applied to RDRs participating in the European Platform for Rare Disease Registries 2011-2014 (EPIRARE) survey.
METHODS:
An indicator of quality was defined by choosing a small set of quality-related variables derived from the survey. The random forest method was used to identify the variables best defining a quality profile for RDRs. Fisher’s exact test was employed to assess the association with the indicator of quality, and the Cochran-Armitage test was used to check the presence of a linear trend along different levels of quality.
RESULTS:
The set of variables found to characterize high-quality RDRs focused on ethical and legal issues, governance, communication of activities and results, established procedures to regulate access to data and security, and established plans to ensure long-term sustainability.
CONCLUSIONS:
The quality of RDRs is usually associated with a good oversight and governance mechanism and with durable funding. The results suggest that RDRs would benefit from support in management, information technology, epidemiology, and statistics.

Lay summary

 

Further info

Click here to view the publication at the journal website
 
Click here to view an open-access copy of this publication